Transversus Abdominis Release Research Articles

Robotic transversus abdominis release using HUGO RAS system: our initial experience.

Transversus abdominis release (TAR) is an effective technique for treating large midline and off-midline hernias. Recent studies have demonstrated that robotic TAR (rTAR) is technically feasible and associated with improved outcomes compared to open surgery. There is no published experience to date describing abdominal wall reconstruction using the novel robotic platform HUGO RAS System (Medtronic®). All consecutive patients who underwent a rTAR in our institution were included. Three of the four arm carts of the HUGO RAS System were used at any given time. Each arm configuration was defined by our team in conjunction with Medtronic® personnel. rTAR was performed as previously described. Upon completion of the TAR on one side, a redocking process with different, mirrored arms angles was performed to continue with the contralateral TAR. Operative variables and early morbidity were recorded. Ten patients were included in this study. The median BMI was 31 (21-40.6) kg/m2. The median height was 1.6m (1.5-1.89m). A trend of decreased operative time, console time, and redocking time was seen in these consecutive cases. No intraoperative events nor postoperative morbidity was reported. The median length of stay was 3 (1-6) days. Robotic TAR utilizing the HUGO RAS system is a feasible and safe procedure. The adoption of this procedure on this novel platform for the treatment of complex abdominal wall hernias has been successful for our team.

Outcomes of posterior sheath supplementation with Vicryl mesh in TAR-a single-center study.

In the Transversus Abdominis Release (TAR) procedure, ideally, the posterior sheath is completely reapproximated to establish an interface isolating the polypropylene mesh from visceral contents. When primary closure of the posterior sheath is unachievable, Vicryl mesh is commonly used to supplement the posterior sheath closure and an uncoated polypropylene mesh is placed superficial to the Vicryl mesh. The long-term implications of utilizing Vicryl mesh as an antiadhesive barrier are poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to assess our outcomes when utilizing Vicryl mesh to supplement the posterior sheath defects when placed underneath polypropylene mesh in patients undergoing posterior component separation. Adult patients who underwent VHR with concurrent TAR procedure with a permanent synthetic mesh and posterior sheath supplementation with Vicryl mesh in the Cleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health between January 2014 and December 2022 were queried retrospectively from a prospectively collected database in the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative. We evaluated 30-day wound morbidity, perioperative complications, long-term mesh-related complications, and pragmatic hernia recurrence. 53 patients who underwent TAR procedure with posterior sheath supplementation using Vicryl mesh and had a minimum 12-month follow-up were identified. Of the53 patients, 94.3% presented with recurrent hernias, 73.6% had a midline hernia, 7.5% had a flank hernia, and 18.9% had concurrent parastomal hernia. The mean hernia width was 24.9 cm (± 8.8 cm). No Vicryl mesh-related operative complications were identified in our study, with no instances of mesh erosion, fistulas, or interventions for small bowel obstruction. Skin necrosis requiring reoperations was observed in three patients (5.7%), leading to permanent mesh excision in two cases (3.8%) without intraabdominal visceral involvement. Throughout the 12-month follow-up, 23 incidences (43.4%) of surgical site occurrences (SSOs) and surgical site occurrences requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI) were documented. Our findings suggest that posterior sheath supplementation with Vicryl mesh is a feasible approach to achieve posterior sheath closure in challenging abdominal wall reconstruction cases. Given the absence of notable mesh-related complications and a similar hernia recurrence rate to cases without posterior sheath supplementation, Vicryl mesh can be used to safely achieve posterior sheath closure in complex reconstructions with insufficient native tissue.

Robotic transversus abdominis release (TAR) for ventral hernia repairs is associated with low surgical site occurrence rates and length of stay despite increasing modifiable comorbidities.

Modifiable comorbidities (MCMs) have previously been shown to complicate postoperative wound healing occasionally leading to surgeon hesitancy to repair ventral hernias prior to preoperative optimization of comorbidities. This study describes the effects of MCMs on surgical site occurrences (SSOs) and hospital length of stay (LOS) following robotic transversus abdominis release (TAR) with poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) resorbable biosynthetic mesh retromuscular sublay for ventral hernia repair in patients who had not undergone preoperative optimization. A single-surgeon retrospective review was performed for patients who underwent the robotic TAR procedure with P4HB mesh between January 2015 and May 2022. Patients were stratified by the amount of MCMs present: 0, 1, or 2 + . MCMs included obesity, diabetes, and current tobacco use. Patient data was analyzed for the first 60days following their operation. Primary outcomes included 60-day SSO rates and hospital LOS. Three hundred and thirty-four subjects met the inclusion criteria for SSO and prolonged LOS analysis. 16.8% had no MCM, 56.1% had 1 MCM, and 27% had 2 + MCMs. No significant difference in SSO was seen between the 3 groups; however, having 2 + MCMs was significantly associated with increased odds of SSO (odds ratio 3.25, P = .019). When the groups were broken down, only having a history of diabetes plus obesity was associated with significantly increased odds of SSO (odds ratio 3.54, P = .02). No group showed significantly increased odds of prolonged LOS. 2 + MCMs significantly increase the odds of SSO, specifically in patients who have a history of diabetes and obesity. However, the presence of any number of MCMs was not associated with increased odds of prolonged LOS.

Parastomal hernia repair, trying to optimize the impossible reconstruction.

Parastomal hernias are a common and challenging problem with high rates of wound complications and hernia recurrence after repair. We present our approach to optimizing parastomal hernia repair through preoperative preparation, surgical approach, and postoperative management. Patients are carefully evaluated and optimized prior to surgery. Our typical surgical approach involves a generous midline laparotomy and retrorectus dissection followed by a posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release. We typically utilize a Sugarbaker technique for retromuscular mesh placement but also use the retromuscular keyhole or cruciate technique if there is insufficient bowel length. Previously published results from our institution include wound complication rates of up to 16% after open retromuscular parastomal hernia repair. Stoma-specific complications, such as mesh erosion in the bowel, may be attributed to the mesh placement techniques. Hernia recurrence rates range from 11 to 30% up to 2years postoperatively. We prefer an open retromuscular approach with a Sugarbaker mesh configuration to treat complex parastomal hernias. However, wound morbidity and repair failure rates remain high, and additional research is needed to optimize surgical outcomes.

Anterior versus posterior component separation technique for advanced abdominal wall reconstruction: a proposed algorithm.

The precise indications for employing the anterior component separation technique (ACST) and the Transversus Abdominis Release (TAR) in abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) remain uncertain, despite the undeniable value of both techniques. The aim of this study was to analyze the anterior fascial closure rate, postoperative wound morbidity, and hernia recurrence rate for both procedures according to the algorithm used for complex AWR. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was carried out. Patients undergoing AWR for midline incisional hernias using either open or endoscopic ACST (E-ACST) or TAR between March 2013 and August 2022 were included. Patients with lateral hernia components were excluded. The surgical technique was depending on the pre- and intraoperative findings regarding hernia width and on the estimated traction to achieve anterior fascial closure (see algorithm). Initially, intermediate hernia defects ranging from approximately 10-14cm in width were repaired using E-ACST. However, as the study advanced, TAR became the preferred method for addressing these types of defects. Open ACST was consistently employed for defects wider than 14-15cm throughout the entire study duration. Outcomes of interest were anterior fascial closure, surgical site occurrences, and hernia recurrence rate. Follow-up was performed at 1month, 1year, and 2years. A total of 119 patients underwent AWR with CST: 63 patients (52.9%) were included in the ACST group and 56 patients (47.1%) in the TAR group. No significant differences were observed in patient and hernia characteristics. The use of botulinum toxin A (BTA) injection and preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum (PPP) was more frequently used in the ACST group (BTA 19.0%, PPP 15.9% versus BTA 5.4%, PPP 1.8% for TAR patients). Anterior fascial closure was achieved in 95.2% of the ACST group and 98.2% of the TAR group (p = 0.369). The TAR group demonstrated a significantly lower SSO rate at one month (44.3% versus 14.3%, p < 0.001) and required fewer procedural interventions (SSO-PI) (31.1% versus 8.9%, p = 0.003). The recurrence rate at one year was low and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (ACST 1.8% vs TAR 4.5%, p = 0.422). Following a proposed algorithm, the anterior fascial closure rate was high and similar for both techniques. As postoperative wound morbidity is significantly increased after ACST, our findings support recommending TAR for defects up to 14cm in width, while favoring open ACST for larger defects.

Postoperative bleeding after complex abdominal wall reconstruction: A post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial

BackgroundAbdominal wall reconstruction requires extensive dissection of the abdominal wall, exposure of the retroperitoneum, and aggressive chemoprophylaxis to reduce the risk of thromboembolic complications. The need for early anticoagulation puts patients at risk for bleeding. We aimed to quantify postoperative blood loss, incidence of transfusion and reoperation, and associated risk factors in patients undergoing complex abdominal wall reconstruction. MethodsAll patients underwent a posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release and placement of retromuscular mesh for ventral hernias <20 cm wide and were enrolled in a clinical trial assessing the utility of trans-fascial mesh fixation. A post hoc analysis was performed to quantify postoperative hemoglobin drop, blood transfusions, and procedural interventions for ongoing bleeding during the first 30 postoperative days. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of transfusion. ResultsIn 325 patients, hemoglobin decreased by 3.61 (±1.58) g/dL postoperatively. Transfusion incidence was 9.5% (n = 31), and 3.1% (n = 10) required a surgical intervention for bleeding. Initiation of therapeutic anticoagulation postoperatively resulted in a higher likelihood of requiring surgical intervention for bleeding (odds ratio 10.4 [95% confidence interval 2.75–43.8], P < .01). Use of perioperative therapeutic anticoagulation was associated with higher rates of transfusion (odds ratio 3.51 [95% confidence interval 1.34–8.53], P < .01). Neither intraoperative blood loss nor operative times were associated with an increased transfusion requirement or need for operative intervention. ConclusionPatients undergoing transversus abdominis release are at a high risk of postoperative bleeding that can require transfusion and reoperation. Patients requiring postoperative therapeutic anticoagulation are at particularly high risk.

Two-meshes approach in posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release: the IMPACT study (Italian Multicentric Posterior-separation Abdominal Complex hernia Transversus-release).

Surgical management of large ventral hernias (VH) has remained a challenge. Various techniques like anterior component separation and posterior component separation (PCS) with transversus abdominis release (TAR) have been employed. Despite the initial success, the long-term efficacy of TAR is not yet comprehensively studied. Authors aimed to investigate the early-, medium-, and long-term outcomes and health-related quality of life (QoL) in patients treated with PCS and TAR. This multicenter retrospective study analyzed data of 308 patients who underwent open PCS with TAR for primary or recurrent complex abdominal hernias between 2015 and 2020. The primary endpoint was the rate of hernia recurrence (HR) and mesh bulging (MB) at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36months. Secondary outcomes included surgical site events and QoL, assessed using EuraHS-QoL score. The average follow-up was 38.3 ± 12.7months. The overall HR rate was 3.5% and the MB rate was 4.7%. Most of the recurrences were detected by clinical and ultrasound examination. QoL metrics showed improvement post-surgery. This study supports the long-term efficacy of PCS with TAR in the treatment of large and complex VH, with a low recurrence rate and an improvement in QoL. Further research is needed for a more in-depth understanding of these outcomes and the factors affecting them.

Open transversus abdominis release in incisional hernia repair: technical limits and solutions.

Incisional hernias with a defect width of more than10cm are considered complex. The European Hernia Society guidelines recommend that such hernias should only be repaired by surgeons with experience of component separation. The standard component separation technique now is posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release (PCSTAR). Questions are raised about the limits of this technique. A literature search of publications on PCSTAR was performed for any references to the limits of this technique in open incisional hernia repair. We found 26 publications relevant to answer this research questions. The standard PCSTAR can generally be used for a defect width of up to 15-17cm. For defects greater than 17cm problems must be expected with procedural tasks involving closure of the posterior layer and anterior fascia. No data are available in the literature on the bridging rate for the posterior layer. However, our own experiences show that gaps (holes) occur in the very thin peritoneum/fascia transversalis during dissection and these must be carefully closed. Furthermore, bridging with an absorbable synthetic mesh is needed not so rarely. Closure of the anterior fascia is successful in 81.0-97.2% of cases. In addition to a further mesh for anterior fascial closure, the hernia sac bound with multiple, accordion-like stitches can also be used. For a defect width greater than 17cm, the limits of PCSTAR become increasingly evident and can be overcome through special technical solutions for closure of the posterior layer and the anterior fascia.

Can surgeons accurately identify mesh type when interpreting computed tomography scans after ventral hernia repair?

Recurrent ventral hernia repair can be challenging due to scarred tissue planes and the increasing complexity of disease related to multiple recurrences. Given the challenges of acquiring complete and accurate prior operative reports, surgeons often rely on computed tomography (CT) scans to obtain information and plan for re-operation. Still, the contribution of CT scans and the ability of surgeons to interpret them is controversial. Previously, we examined the ability of surgeons to determine prior operative techniques based on CT scans. Here, we assessed the accuracy of expert abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) surgeons in identifying the type of prior mesh using CT imaging. A total of 22 highly experienced AWR surgeons were asked to evaluate 21 CT scans of patients who had undergone open ventral hernia repair with bilateral transversus abdominis release utilizing mesh. The surgeons were required to identify the mesh type from a multiple-choice selection. Additionally, negative controls (patients without a history of prior laparotomy) and positive controls (patients with laparotomy but no ventral hernia repair) were incorporated. The accuracy of the surgeons and interrater reliability was calculated. The accuracy rate of the surgeons in correctly identifying the mesh type was 46%, with heavy-weight synthetic mesh (HWSM) being identified only 35.4% of the time, Strattice mesh and medium-weight synthetic mesh (MWSM) were identified at 46.3%, and 51.8%, respectively. The interrater reliability analysis found a moderate level of agreement 0.428 (95% CI 0.356-0.503), and the repeatability measure was poor-0.053 (95% CI 0-0.119); this indicates that surgeons cannot reliably replicate the identification process. Surgeons' ability to accurately identify the type of previous mesh using CT scans is poor. This study underscores the importance of documenting the type of mesh used in the operative report and the need for standardized operative notes to improve the accuracy and consistency of documentation.

Computed tomography measurements to predict need for robotic transversus abdominis release: a single institution analysis.

The radiographic rectus width to hernia width ratio (RDR) has been shown to predict ability to close fascial defect without additional myofascial release in open Rives-Stoppa abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR), but it has not been studied in robotic AWR. We aimed to examine various CT measurements to determine their usability in predicting the need for transversus abdominis release (TAR) in robotic AWR. We performed a single-center retrospective review of 137 patients with midline ventral hernias over a 5-year period who underwent elective robotic retrorectus AWR. We excluded patients with M1 or M5 hernias, lateral/flank hernias, and hybrid repairs. The CT measurements included hernia width (HW), hernia width/abdominal width ratio (HW/AW), and RDR. Univariate, multivariate and area under the curve (AUC) analyses were performed. 58/137 patients required TAR (32 unilateral, 26 bilateral). Patients undergoing TAR had a significantly higher average HW and HW/AW and lower RDR. Multivariate analysis revealed that prior hernia repair was independently associated with need for TAR (p = 0.03). ROC analysis and AUC values showed acceptable diagnostic ability of HW, HW/AW and RDR in predicting need for TAR. Cutoffs of RDR ≤ 2, HW/AW > 0.3, and HW > 10cm yielded high specificity in determining need for any TAR (97.5% vs. 96.2% vs. 92.4%) or bilateral TAR (95.5% vs. 94.6% vs. 92.8%). History of prior hernia repair was a risk factor for robotic TAR. CT measurements have some predictive value in determining need for TAR in robotic AWR. Further prospective analysis is needed in this patient population.

Sequential surgeries following transversus abdominis release for abdominal wall reconstruction: Insights from a single-center analysis

IntroductionAbdominal surgery following transversus abdominis release (TAR) procedure commonly involves incisions through the previously implanted mesh, potentially creating vulnerabilities for hernia recurrence. Despite the popularity of the TAR procedure, current literature regarding post-AWR surgeries is limited. This study aims to reveal the incidence and outcomes of post-TAR non-hernia-related abdominal surgeries of any kind. MethodsAdult patients who underwent non-hernia-related abdominal surgery following ventral hernia repair with concurrent TAR procedure and permanent synthetic mesh in the Cleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health between January 2014 and January 2022 were queried from a prospectively collected database in the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative. We evaluated 30-day wound morbidity, perioperative complications, and long-term hernia recurrence. ResultsA total of 1137 patients who underwent TAR procedure were identified, with 53 patients (4.7%) undergoing subsequent non-hernia-related abdominal surgery post-TAR. Small bowel obstruction was the primary indication for reoperation (22.6%), and bowel resection was the most frequent procedure (24.5%). 49.1% of the patients required urgent or emergent surgery, with the majority (70%) having open procedures. Fascia closure was achieved by absorbable sutures in 50.9%, and of the open cases, fascia closure was achieved by running sutures technique in 35.8%. 20.8% experienced SSO, the SSOPI rate was 11.3%, and 26.4% required more than a single reoperation. A total of 88.7% were available for extended follow-up, spanning 17–30 months, resulting in a 36.1% recurrent hernia diagnosis rate. ConclusionsAbdominal surgery following TAR surgery is associated with significant comorbidities and significantly impacts hernia recurrence rates. Our study findings underscore the significance of making all efforts to minimize reoperations after TAR procedure and offers suggestions on managing the abdominal wall of these complex cases.

T-line Hernia Mesh Repairs of Large Umbilical Hernias: Technique and Short-term Outcomes.

The T-line hernia mesh is a synthetic, polypropylene mesh specifically designed to prevent anchor point failure by evenly distributing tension through mesh suture extensions. This case series illustrates the first clinical application of the T-line mesh for umbilical hernia repair (UHR). This study is a retrospective, consecutive cases series of all adult patients presenting to a single surgeon with symptomatic umbilical hernia requiring surgical repair using the T-line hernia mesh. Patient demographics, surgical details, and 30-day postoperative complications were collected. Descriptive statistics were computed in Microsoft Excel (Redmond, Va.). Three patients presented for UHR. All three patients were obese with mean body mass index of 37.5 ± 6.6. Two patients were former smokers, and two had presented after hernia recurrence. The average defect size was 80.1 cm2 ± 94.0 cm2. Two patients had UHR with onlay mesh placement, whereas one had a transversus abdominus release followed by retrorectus mesh placement. The average mesh size was 192.3 cm2 ± 82.5 cm2. All three cases were classified as clean. There were no intraoperative complications. No patients experienced 30-day postoperative complications or recurrence. We present a case series of three patients presenting with large, symptomatic umbilical hernias who underwent UHR with T-line hernia mesh reinforcement without short term complications or hernia recurrence at last follow-up.

Cannabis smoking and abdominal wall reconstruction outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Despite increasing use of cannabis, literature on perioperative effects is lagging. We compared active cannabis-smokers versus non-smokers and postoperative wound morbidity and reoperations following open abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). Patients who underwent open, clean, AWR with transversus abdominis release and retromuscular synthetic mesh placement at our institution between January 2014 and May 2022 were identified using the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database. Active cannabis-smokers were 1:3 propensity matched to non-smokers based on demographics and comorbidities. Wound complications, 30day morbidity, pain (PROMIS 3a-Pain Intensity), and hernia-specific quality of life (HerQles) were compared. Seventy-two cannabis-smokers were matched to 216 non-smokers. SSO (18% vs 17% p = 0.86), SSI (11.1% vs 9.3%, p = 0.65), SSOPI (12% vs 12%, p = 0.92), and all postoperative complications (46% vs 43%, p = 0.63) were similar between cannabis-smokers and non-smokers. Reoperations were more common in the cannabis-smoker group (8.3% vs 2.8%, p = 0.041), driven by major wound complications (6.9% vs 3.2%, p = 0.004). No mesh excisions occurred. HerQles scores were similar at baseline (22 [11, 41] vs 35 [14, 55], p = 0.06), and were worse for cannabis-smokers compared to non-smokers at 30days (30 [12, 50] vs 38 [20, 67], p = 0.032), but not significantly different at 1year postoperatively (72 [53, 90] vs 78 [57, 92], p = 0.39). Pain scores were worse for cannabis-smokers compared to non-smokers at 30days postoperatively (52 [46, 58] vs 49 [44, 54], p = 0.01), but there were no differences at 6months or 1year postoperatively (p > 0.05 for all). Cannabis smokers will likely experience similar complication rates after clean, open AWR, but should be counseled that despite similar wound complication rates, the severity of their wound complications may be greater than non-smokers.

Abdominal Wall Tension and Early Outcomes after Posterior Component Separation with Transversus Abdominis Release: Does a "Tension-Free" Closure Really Matter?

Ventral hernias result in fibrosis of the lateral abdominal wall muscles, increasing tension on fascial closure. Little is known about the effect of abdominal wall tension on outcomes after abdominal wall reconstruction. We aimed to identify an association between abdominal wall tension and early postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent posterior components separation (PCS) with transversus abdominis release (TAR). Using a proprietary, sterilizable tensiometer, the tension needed to bring the anterior fascial elements to the midline of the abdominal wall during PCS with TAR were recorded. Tensiometer measurements, in pounds (lb), were calibrated by accounting for the acceleration of Earth's gravity. Baseline fascial tension, change in fascial tension, and fascial tension at closure were evaluated with respect to 30-day outcomes, including wound morbidity, hospital readmission, reoperation, ileus, bleeding, and pulmonary complications. A total of 100 patients underwent bilateral abdominal wall tensiometry, for a total of 200 measurements (left and right side for each patient). Mean baseline anterior fascial tension was 6.78 lb (SD 4.55) on each side. At abdominal closure, the mean anterior fascial tension was 3.12 (SD 3.21) lb on each side. Baseline fascial tension and fascial tension after PCS with TAR at abdominal closure were not associated with surgical site infection, surgical site occurrence, readmission, ileus, and bleeding requiring transfusion. The event rates for all other complications were too infrequent for statistical analysis. Baseline and residual fascial tension of the anterior abdominal wall do not correlate with early postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing PCS with TAR. Further work is needed to determine if abdominal wall tension in this context is associated with long-term outcomes, such as hernia recurrence.

Comparison of open and endoscopic posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release: a propensity score-matched study.

Posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release (TAR) is considered to be the optimal technique for large incisional ventral hernia repair. Endoscopic TAR (eTAR) that gets all the benefits of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) gives a possibility to enhance results of the treatment. The aim of our study was to make the comparison between open and endoscopic TAR procedures with an emphasis on frequency and severity of postoperative complications in comparable groups. All patients had midline incisional hernia and underwent either open (open TAR group) or endoscopic (eTAR group) Rives-Stoppa repair in combination with bilateral transversus abdominis release in Moscow City Hospital №1 from January 2018 to December 2022. A propensity score matching (PSM) was used to make groups comparable. Postoperative complications were classified according to Clavien-Dindo Classification, and Comprehensive complication index was calculated. We performed 133 open and endoscopic TAR separation for midline incisional hernia. After PSM analysis 51 patients were matched to each group. Overall surgical morbidity in the open TAR group (56.9%) was statistically significantly higher than in the eTAR group (29.4%) (p = 0.009). There were more severe complications (Clavien IIIa-V) in the open TAR group (11.8% vs. 0%, p = 0.027). Length of hospital stay after surgery was shorter in eTAR group (p < 0.001). The Comprehensive complication index in the open TAR group was significantly higher than in eTAR group, 8.7 (0-20.9) vs. 0 (0-8.7) (p = 0.011). Based on the data from our study, the entire MIS procedure including endoscopic TAR is a safe and optimal technique for surgery of midline incisional ventral hernia, requiring TAR separation in terms of reducing the rate of postoperative complications, their severity and hospital length of stay, compared to open TAR procedure.

Endoscopic Mini- or Less-Open Sublay operation with transversus abdominis muscle release using a single-port platform for incisional hernia: A video vignette

The Endoscopic Mini- or Less-open Sublay operation (EMILOS) is a transhernial repair that allows endoscopic dissection and mesh placement in the retrorectus/retromuscular space, and simultaneous transversus abdominis release (TAR) for larger hernias. The operative summary is as follows. 1 A 7-cm longitudinal skin incision was made immediately above the hernial orifice. 2 The hernial sac was circumferentially dissected to the border of the defect, and the abdomen was opened. 3 The posterior rectus sheath (PRS) was incised approximately 5mm lateral to the medial border of the rectus sheath to enter the retrorectus space. 4 Exploratory laparoscopy was performed, and the peritoneum was closed. 5 A single port platform was attached to the wound, and the abdominal wall was insufflated. The retrorectal space was dissected laterally to the outer edge of the rectus abdominis muscle. The linea alba was incised at least 5cm cranially and caudally from the border of the hernia defect to obtain sufficient mesh overlap. 6 The TAR was added to the left side to facilitate medial advancement of the PRS. (7) The PRS was approximated with continuous suture. A self-gripping mesh was trimmed and implanted in the retrorectus space. The mesh was secured with 3-0 absorbable sutures (8) A closed-suction drain was placed on the mesh, and the wound was trimmed and closed. The postoperative course was uneventful. No recurrence was observed at 6-month follow-up. This technique may be advantageous because it allows minimal skin incision with physiological reconstruction of abdominal wall.

Outcomes of posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release for repair of abdominally based breast reconstruction donor site hernias.

Abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction (ABABR) is common after mastectomy, but carries a risk of complex abdominal wall hernias. We report experience with posterior component separation (PCS) and transversus abdominis release (TAR) with permanent synthetic mesh repair of ABABR-related hernias. Patients at Cleveland Clinic Foundation and Penn State Health were identified retrospectively. Outcomes included postoperative complications, hernia recurrence, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs): Hernia Recurrence Inventory, HerQLes Summary Score, Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity 3a Survey, and the Decision Regret Scale (DRS). Forty patients underwent PCS/TAR repair of hernias resulting from pedicled (35%), free (5%), muscle-sparing TRAMs (15%), and DIEPs (28%) from August 2014 to March 2021. Following PCS, 30-day complications included superficial surgical site infection (13%), seroma (8%), and superficial wound breakdown (5%). Five patients (20%) developed clinical hernia recurrence. At a minimum of 1year, 17 (63%) reported a bulge, 12 (44%) reported pain, median HerQLes Quality Of Life Scores improved from 33 to 63/100 (p value < 0.01), PROMIS 3a Pain Intensity Scores improved from 52 to 38 (p value < 0.05), and DRS scores were consistent with low regret (20/100). ABABR-related hernias are complex and technically challenging due to missing abdominal wall components and denervation injury. After repair with PCS/TAR, patients had high rates of recurrence and bulge, but reported improved quality of life and pain and low regret. Surgeons should set realistic expectations regarding postoperative bulge and risk of hernia recurrence.

Five years of robot-assisted ventral hernia repair: initial experience and surgical outcome

Objective Robot-assisted ventral hernia repair (RVHR) has become a feasible alternative for open ventral hernia repair showing fewer postoperative complications and satisfying short-term results. However, long-term results are scarce in current literature. Methods All consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted surgery for ventral hernias from June 2018 until February 2023 were included. Patient records were retrospectively reviewed for indication, need for conversion, length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications, and postoperative pain. In addition, long-term (>24 months) results (recurrence, chronic pain, and esthetic satisfaction) were assessed by phone questionnaire. Results In total, 177 patients underwent a robot-assisted ventral hernia repair. Indication for surgery was incisional hernia (N = 109) and primary hernia (N = 68), including 124 cases with abdominal rectus diastasis. A TransAbdominal Retromuscular Umbilical Prosthesis (TARUP) was performed in 138 patients. Robotic Transversus Abdominis Release (TAR) and Extended Totally Extraperitoneal Repair (eTEP) were performed in 20 (11%) and 9 (5%) cases, respectively. Median LOS was 2 days for TARUP and 3.5 days for TAR. Minor complications occurred in 22 patients (16 TARUP, 5 TAR, 1 eTEP). The average pain score on the first postoperative day was 1.8/10. No risk factors for morbidity could be identified by uni- and multivariable analysis. Hernia recurrence developed in four (2%) patients. Chronic pain was reported in two (1%) cases. Seven (4%) patients had esthetic complaints. Conclusion Robot-assisted ventral hernia repair is a safe procedure with low postoperative pain and short LOS. Long-term results including recurrence and chronic pain are satisfying.

Component separation repair of incisional hernia: evolution of practice and review of long-term outcomes in a single center.

To review the long-term outcomes of complex abdominal wall reconstruction using anterior and posterior component separation (CS) techniques in our center. This was a descriptive analytical study. Analysis of data from a prospectively collected database of patients who had undergone Component Separation (CS) repair of incisional hernias was performed. Two techniques were used. Anterior component separation (ACS) and posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release (PCS/TAR). Follow-up was clinical review at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months with direct access telephone review thereafter. Long-term outcome data was obtained from electronic records and based on either clinical or CT assessment. Minimum physical follow-up was 6 months for all patients. 89 patients with large incisional hernias underwent CS repair. 29 patients had ACS while 60 underwent PCS/TAR. Mean follow-up was 60 months (range 6-140 months) in the ACS group and 20 months (range 6-72 months) in the PCS group. Twenty-five patients (28%) had simultaneous major procedures including 21 intestinal anastomoses. Twenty-six (29%) of patients had associated stomas. Twenty-seven (30.3%) of the patients had undergone previous hernia repairs. Seromas occurred in 24 (26.97%) patients. Wound infections were more common after ACS. There have been 10 (11.2%) recurrences to date. Component separation repair techniques result in good long-term outcomes with acceptable complication rates. They can be performed simultaneously with gastrointestinal procedures with low morbidity. Appropriate patient selection and use of appropriate mesh are important.

Outcomes after ventral hernia repair using the extended totally extraperitoneal approach: Initial experience from the Philippines.

Newer extraperitoneal techniques of laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair (LVIHR) have been continually introduced since the popularity of the laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh technique began in 1993. One of which is the extended totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) approach allowing wide mesh augmentation, concurrent repair of diastasis recti, and performance of transversus abdominis release (TAR) for large/complex hernias. However, minimally invasive/laparoendoscopic ventral hernia repair is not yet widely adopted in the Philippines. We aim to share our preliminary experience with LVIHR using the eTEP approach. This was a retrospective review of all consecutive eTEP repairs for ventral hernia between January 2019 and September 2023. The clinical profiles of all patients were gathered. Hernia characteristics, operative profile, and postoperative outcomes were reported. Thirty-five patients were included in the study with a mean age of 54.7; 60% were incisional hernias, and the most common hernia location was the umbilical area. A defect size between 4 and 10 cm was reported in 54.3%. eTEP-TAR was necessary in 12 patients. At a median follow-up of 16 months, two patients developed seroma, one hematoma, and two surgical site infections. All were successfully managed conservatively. Only one patient developed recurrence. eTEP approach is safe and feasible for repairing ventral hernias. Our preliminary experience showed acceptable outcomes similar to the published literature. Surgeons interested in this technique should be familiar with the abdominal wall anatomy, carefully select patients during preoperative planning, and undergo mentorship with hernia surgeons experienced with the technique to shorten the learning curve.